PONZI BOOM & BUST GO HAND IN HAND. IT'S BOOM FOR THE INSIDERS AND BUST FOR THE OUTSIDERS. - THERE'S NO LEFT NOR RIGHT
. IT'S THE WORKING CITIZEN (OUTSIDERS)AGAINST THE MONETARY+RELIGIOUS+MILITARY FRAUD OF THE ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE, THE DEEP STATE INSIDERS BEHIND THE SCENES AS CAR WASHERS IN THE SWAMP. WHEN THE CORRUPT ARE UNLEASHED TO FIGHT THE ANTI-CORRUPT, THE WORLD TURNS UPSIDE-DOWN IN OVER 200-CENTRAL BANK OWNED COUNTRIES.
FEW REALIZE THAT
THE REASON FOR SOCIALISM'S "WE THE PEOPLE'S" HARD CURRENCY
HARDSHIPS HAS BEEN THE SABOTAGING OF ITS SUCCESSFUL ECONOMY OF HARD CURRENCY BY
WORTHLESS PAPER PONZI CURRENCY, A MONETARY US$ FRAUD, AND ITS ENDEMIC FALSE PROSPERITY OF ALICE IN
WONDERLAND, UNPAYABLE DEBTS LED BY WITCHDOCTOR ECONOMISTS LIKE KEYNES
'US doesn't want strong & independent Brazil backing Latin America' – Brazil's Lula
Khazarian
.
'US doesn't want strong & independent Brazil backing Latin America' – Brazil's Lula da Silva
The political chaos in Brazil is a result of collusion between local elites and the US, which doesn't want a strong new independent player in Latin America and beyond, former Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told RT.
Lula da Silva, 72, who served as Brazil's president from 2003 until 2011 and is one of the most popular politicians in the country's history, is now eyeing another presidential term. Polls suggest this could be a possibility, unless his ambitions are quashed by a pending court decision, which will either uphold or dismiss a nine-year sentence for corruption.
Commonly known as Lula, the Brazilian Workers' Party icon spoke on RT Spanish show , Conversation with Correa, hosted by Ecuador's former president Rafael Correa.
Lula accused Brazilian elites of having common interests with their American counterparts, saying they pursue those interests at the expense of democratic freedoms in Brazil and the wellbeing of its South American neighbors.
"Before, Brazil was looking at the US and the EU with its back towards South American countries and Africa. I decided to change that," Lula said, noting that Brazilian elites have never come to terms with his choice. The emerging role of Brazil in the world has raised flags in Washington.
Brazil has become "part of BRICS, one of the biggest players in the world, and the United States was not used to seeing Latin America independent. We acted independently when we refused to join the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), when we created UNASUR and CELAC, when we formed the Council of South American Defense, and especially when we discovered pre-salt oil," Lula said.
He said that his party's draft oil bill has been met with fierce opposition, which he linked to the political crisis. The bill would have introduced additional royalties to be paid by international companies drilling the Brazilian shelf, with the idea that most of the money would be spent on education, science and healthcare.
The former president argued that corruption charges have become an "instrument in the moral and ethical fight against opponents." He called the charges against him "false," and said there was a massive media campaign against him and another former Brazilian president, Dilma Rouseff. "There is a conspiracy in Brazil between the media, the judiciary, the prosecution service and police," said Lula.
Speaking about why it might be better for his country to disentangle itself from the US, Lula said that a potent and prosperous Brazil, which is also an active player in the world arena, is not in Washington's interests.
"It's becoming more and more clear each day that the US doesn't want Latin America to be strong and independent, much less does it want such a big country as Brazil to influence the decisions made by Latin America," he said. "Frankly, North Americans were never truly interested in cooperating with Latin America."
He admitted, however, that Brazil's internal problems could not be entirely blamed on outside factors. "The saddest thing is that I believe we have also made mistakes. It's important to realize thatme and Dilma [Rouseff], we both made some mistakes, our party made mistakes," Lula said. He argued that the Rouseff's impeachment might have been averted: "It wasn't easy for the opposition to achieve this, I think we were not firm enough."
He admitted, however, that Brazil's internal problems could not be entirely blamed on outside factors. "The saddest thing is that I believe we have also made mistakes. It's important to realize that
Commenting on the role that Washington continues to play in Latin American politics, Lula referred to US President Donald Trump as a leader who appears to have not slightest interest in the region.
"He doesn't care about Latin America in the least. He was very clear when he said: 'My main concern is the US and the American people,'" Lula said. However, this stance could be worse, he added, since some Republican US administrations have proven to be less confrontational with Brazil.
"It may seem surprising to you, but Bush and Condoleezza Rice pursued a much more democratic policy towards Brazil than Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton," Lula said, noting that Obama may have been a "charismatic" leader, but his impressive public-speaking skills were not backed up by real actions.
"A powerful man from the US once told me: 'Obama's problem is that, while an exceptional speaker, he tends to forget everything he has said the very next day.' It's true, isn't it? He could give magnificent speeches on any important issue, but never actually delivered on his promises," the ex-president said, referring specifically to the unfulfilled promise to close Guantanamo Bay as one of many examples.
.
_________________________________
The Central Banks of the US, Japan, China and EU are fending off collapse by buying back stocks on corporates
Now this is bigger that statism of communism.
THEY WILL ONLY SURVIVE AS LONG AS THEY ARE ABLE TO:
1. RIG ALL MARKETS, (BUYBACKS OF STOCKS, BONDS, CURRENCIES, JUNK BONDS AND BULLION) ,
2. SABOTAGE ECONOMIES FEATURING HARD CURRENCIES LIKE EMIL
WONTA/REAGAN ERA AND GENERATE CHAOS.
3. MANIPULATE CURRENCIES OF ENEMY COUNTRIES WITH PAPER
DOLLARS, FREE OF COSTS AND ROUND THE CLOCK.
4. THESE ACTIONS GENERATE CHAOS IN THE MARKETS, ECONOMIES
AND SOCIETIES OF ENEMY COUNTRIES. THEY WILL BE HIT LIKE SNIPER FIRE AND WON'T KNOW WHERE THE FIRING COMES FROM, NOR
WOULD THEY KNOW WHICH WAY TO RUN IN A CROSSFIRE.
5. THEIR MIND CONTROL MIDIA AGAIN FUNDED BY FREE PAPER DOLLARS,
IS THE WEAPON FOR THE UPRISING, UNREST AND EVENTUAL COUP.
6. THEY OWN ALL COURTS, SO THE COUP IS LEGAL.
2. ENERGY (ELECTRICITY ETC) IS FREE
8. AND THEY PRINT FREE MONEY ONLY FOR THE 1% TO BUY UP
EVERYTHING FOR FREE AT ZERO COST.
9. THE 99% HAVE TO TOIL (WEIGHTS & MEASURES) IN EXCHANGE FOR FREE PRINTED MONEY AND NOT
WEIGHTED CURRENCY OR THE EQUIVALENT OF WEIGHTED CURRENCY.
11. 1913/The consequence of a Ponzi Oligarchic Central Bank
with 1% kingpins like Sorros running amok printing junk paper and buying
everything for free.
12. The debt unpayable
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''a
OPERAÇÃO LAVA JATO/GOLPÉ/IMPEACHMENT
TEM O CODINOME 'YELLOW DUCK" NA CIA.
Juízes, legisladores, procuradores, midia,
são nomeados pela CIA, segundo Wayne
CIA’s Latest Themed Revolution: The Yellow Duck Revolution in Brazil – Wayne Madsen
The latest themed revolution concocted by the Central Intelligence Agency’s “soft power” agents in the Brazilian federal and state legislatures, corporate media, and courts and prosecutors’ offices – all spurred on with the financial help of George Soros’s nongovernmental organizations – is the “Yellow Duck Revolution”. at US-financed street demonstrations in Brasilia, Rio de Janeiro, and Sao Paulo. The main coordinators of these protests are found in Brazil’s largest corporate federations and corporate-owned media conglomerates and all of them have links to domestic non-profit organizations like Vem Pra Rua (To the Street) – a typical Soros appellation – and Free Brazil Movement, in turn funded by the usual suspects of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), US Agency for International Development (USAID), and Soros’s Open Society Institute.After trying to mount an electoral defeat of Brazil’s progressive leftist president, Dilma Rousseff, through a combination of presidential candidate assassination (the aerial assassination of Eduardo Campos in 2014 to pave the way to the presidency for the Wall Street-owned Green candidate Marina Silva, Campos’s vice presidential running mate), “rent-a-mob” street demonstrations, and corporate media propaganda, the Langley spooks are now trying to run Rousseff from office through a “Made in America” impeachment process. Aware that Rousseff’s progressive predecessor and mentor, Luiz Inacio Lula da prosecutorial CIA . . Lula her prosecutorial . Rousseff . . prosecutorial warrantless Brazilian government operations codenamed . t-shirts . have included . . : an . . at
.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
that
austerity
SEGUNDO GLEN GREENWALD, "A
MAIORIA DAS NOTÍCIAS VINDO DO
BRASIL MIMICA A PROPAGANDA DA
SÃO A OLIGARQUIA CORRUPTA, ANTDEMOCRÁTICA, QUE DESINFORMA, SEM
PRECISÃO, INCOMPLETA E
HOMOGENEIZADO.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE MULTIPLE, REMARKABLE crises consuming Brazil are now garnering substantial Western media attention. That’s understandable given that Brazil is the world’s fifth most populous country and eighth-largest economy; its second-largest city, Rio de Janeiro, is the host of this year’s Summer Olympics.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE MULTIPLE, REMARKABLE crises consuming Brazil are now garnering substantial Western media attention. That’s understandable given that Brazil is the world’s fifth most populous country and eighth-largest economy; its second-largest city, Rio de Janeiro, is the host of this year’s Summer Olympics.
But much of this Western media coverage mimics the propaganda coming from Brazil’s homogenized, oligarch-owned, anti-democracy media outlets and, as such, is misleading, inaccurate, and incomplete, particularly when coming from those with little familiarity with the country (there are numerous Brazil-based Western reporters doing outstanding work).
It is difficult to overstate the severity of Brazil’s multi-level distress. This short paragraph yesterday from the New York Times’s Brazil bureau chief, Simon Romero, conveys how dire it is:
Brazil is suffering its worst economic crisis in decades. An enormous graft scheme has hobbled the national oil company. The Zika epidemic is causing despair across the northeast.
And just before the world heads to Brazil for the Summer Olympics, the government is fighting for survival, with almost every corner of the political system under the cloud of scandal.
Brazil’s extraordinary political upheaval shares some similarities with the Trump-led political chaos in the U.S.: a sui generis, out-of-control circus unleashing instability and some rather dark forces, with a positive ending almost impossible to imagine. The once-remote prospect of President Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment now seems likely.
But one significant difference with the U.S. is
That includes not only Rousseff’s moderately left-wing Workers Party, or PT — which is rife with serious corruption — but also the vast majority of the centrist and right-wing political and economic factions working to destroy PT, which are drowning in at least an equal amount of criminality.
In other words, PT
In reporting on Brazil, Western media outlets have most prominently focused on the increasingly large street protests demanding the impeachment of Rousseff. They have typically depicted cartoon
Last night, NBC News’s Chuck Todd re-tweeted the Eurasia Group’s Ian Bremmer describing anti-Dilma protests as “The People vs. the foreign
That depiction completely ignores the historical context of Brazil’s politics and, more importantly, several critical questions: Who is behind these protests, how representative are the protesters of the Brazilian population, and what is their actual agenda?
THE CURRENT VERSION of Brazilian democracy is very young. In 1964, the country’s democratically elected left-wing government was overthrown by a military coup.
Both publicly and before Congress, U.S. officials directly
The 21-year, right-wing, pro-U. military dictatorship and
A comprehensive 2014 Truth Commission report documented that both countries “trained Brazilian interrogators in torture techniques.” Among their victims was Rousseff, who was an anti-regime, left-wing guerilla imprisoned and tortured by the military dictators in the 1970s.
The coup itself and the dictatorship that followed were supported by Brazil’s oligarchs and their large media outlets, led by Globo, which — notably — depicted the 1964 coup as a noble defeat of a corrupt left-wing government (sound familiar?).
The 1964 coup and dictatorship were also supported by the nation’s extravagantly rich (and overwhelmingly white) upper class and its small middle class.
As democracy opponents often do, Brazil’s wealthy factions regarded dictatorship as protection against the impoverished masses comprised largely of non-whites.
As The Guardian put it upon release
These severe class and race divisions in Brazil remain the dominant dynamic. As the BBC put it in 2014 based on multiple studies: “Brazil has one of the highest levels of income inequality in the world.”
The Americas Quarterly editor-in-chief, Brian Winter, reporting on the protests, wrote this week: “The gap between rich and poor remains the central fact of Brazilian life — and these protests are no different.”
If you want to understand anything about the current political crisis in Brazil, it’s crucial to understand what Winter means by that.
DILMA’S PARTY, PT, was formed in 1980 as a classic Latin American left-wing socialist party. To improve its national appeal, it moderated its socialist dogma and gradually became a party more akin to Europe’s social democrats.
There are now popular parties to its left; indeed, Dilma, voluntarily or otherwise, has advocated austerity measures to cure economic ills and assuage foreign markets, and just this week enacted a draconian “anti-terrorism” law.
Still, PT resides on
In power, PT
PT has held the presidency for 14 years: since 2002. Its popularity has been the byproduct of Dilma’s wildly charismatic predecessor, Luíz Inácio Lula da
Lula’s ascendency was a potent symbol of the empowerment of Brazil’s poor under democracy: a laborer and union leader from a very poor family who dropped out of school in the second grade, did not read until the age of 10, and was imprisoned by the dictatorship for union activities.
dilma_lula-592x296
He has long been mocked by Brazilian elites in starkly classist
After three unsuccessful runs for the presidency, Lula proved to be an unstoppable political force. Elected in 2002 and re-elected in 2006, he left office with such high approval ratings
Though the nation’s oligarchical class has successfully used the center-right PSDB as a counterweight, it has been largely impotent in defeating PT in four consecutive presidential elections. Voting is compulsory, and the nation’s poor citizens have ensured PT’s victories.
Corruption among Brazil’s political class — including the top levels of the PT — is real and substantial. But Brazil’s plutocrats, their media, and the upper and middle classes are glaringly exploiting this corruption scandal to achieve what they have failed for years to accomplish democratically: the removal of PT from power.
Contrary to Chuck Todd’s and Ian Bremmer’s romanticized, misinformed (at best) depiction of these protests as being carried out by “The People,” they are, in fact, incited by the country’s intensely concentrated, homogenized, and powerful corporate media outlets, and are composed (not exclusively but overwhelmingly
Brazil’s corporate media outlets are acting as de facto protest organizers and PR arms of opposition parties. The Twitter feeds of some of Globo’s most influential (and very rich) on-air reporters contain non-stop anti-PT agitation.
When a recording of a telephone conversation between Dilma and Lula was leaked this week, Globo’s highly influential nightly news program, Jornal Nacional, had its anchors flamboyantly re-enact the dialogue in such a melodramatic and provocatively gossipy fashion that it literally resembled a soap opera far more than a news report, prompting widespread ridicule.
For months, Brazil’s top four newsmagazines
To provide some perspective for how central the large corporate media has been
Now imagine what those protests would have been if it had not been just Fox, but also ABC, NBC, CBS, Time magazine, the New York Times, and the Huffington Post also supporting
That is what has been happening in Brazil: The largest outlets are owned and controlled by a tiny number of plutocratic families, virtually all of whom are vehement, class-based opponents of PT and whose media outlets have unified to fuel these protests.
In sum, the business interests owned and represented by those media outlets are almost uniformly pro-impeachment and were linked to the military dictatorship.
As Stephanie Nolen, the Rio-based reporter for Canada’s Globe and Mail, noted: “It is clear that most of the country’s institutions are lined up against the president.”
Put simply, this is a campaign to subvert Brazil’s democratic outcomes by monied factions that have long hated the results of democratic elections, deceitfully marching under an anti-corruption banner: quite similar to the 1964 coup.
Indeed, much of the Brazilian right longs for restoration factions
None of this is a defense of PT. Both because of genuine widespread corruption in that party and national economic woes, Dilma and PT are intensely unpopular among all classes and groups, even including the party’s working-class base.
But the street protests — as undeniably large and energized as they have been — are driven by those who are traditionally hostile to PT.
The number of people participating in these protests — while in the millions — is dwarfed by the number (54 million) who voted to re-elect Dilma less than two years ago.
In a democracy, governments are chosen by voting, not by displays of street opposition — particularly where, as in Brazil, the protests are drawn from a relatively narrow societal segment.
As Winter reported: “Last Sunday, when more than 1 million people took to the streets, polls indicated that once again the crowd was significantly richer, whiter, and more educated than Brazilians at large.”
Nolen similarly reported: “The half-dozen large anti-corruption demonstrations in the past year have been dominated by white and upper-middle-class protesters, who tend to be supporters of the opposition Brazilian Social Democratic Party (PSDB), and to have little love for Ms. Rousseff’s
Last weekend, when massive anti-Dilma protests emerged in most Brazilian cities, a photograph of one of the families participating went viral, a symbol of what these protests actually are.
It showed a rich, white couple decked out in anti-Dilma symbols and walking with their pure-breed dog, trailed by their black “weekend nanny” — wearing the all-white uniform many rich Brazilians require their domestic servants to wear — pushing a stroller with their two children.
As Nolen noted, the photo became the emblem for the true, highly ideological essence of these protests: “Brazilians, who are deft and fast with memes, reposted
TO BELIEVE THAT the influential figures agitating for Dilma’s impeachment are motivated by an authentic anti-corruption crusade requires extreme naïveté or willful ignorance.
To begin with, the factions that would be empowered by Dilma’s impeachment are at least as implicated by corruption scandals as she is: in most cases, more so.
Five of the members of the impeachment commission are themselves being criminally investigated as part of the corruption scandal.
That includes Paulo Maluf, who faces an Interpol warrant for his arrest and has not been able to leave the country for years; he has been sentenced in France to three years
Of the 65 members of the House impeachment committee, 36 currently face pending legal proceedings.
In the lower house of Congress, the leader of the impeachment movement, the evangelical extremist Eduardo Cunha, was found to have maintained multiple secret Swiss bank accounts, where he stored
Meanwhile, Senator Aécio Neves, the leader of the Brazilian opposition who Dilma narrowly defeated in the 2014 election, has himself been implicated at least five separate times in the corruption scandal. One of the prosecutors’ newest star witnesses just accused him of accepting bribes.
That witness also implicated the country’s vice president, Michel Temer, of the opposition party PMDB, who would replace Dilma if she were impeached.
Then there’s the recent behavior of the chief judge who has been overseeing the corruption investigation and has become a folk hero for his commendably aggressive investigations of some of the country’s richest and most powerful figures.
That judge, Sergio Moro, this week effectively leaked to the media a tape-recorded, extremely vague conversation between Dilma and Lula, which Globo and other anti-PT forces immediately depicted as incriminating. Moro
By Glenn Greenwald, Andrew Fishman and David Miranda
(Para ler a versão desse em
The Intercept
Print this entry
http://www.4thmedia.org/2016/03/brazil-is-engulfed-by-ruling-class-corruption-and-a-dangerous-subversion-of-democracy/
http://www.4thmedia.org/2016/03/brazil-is-engulfed-by-ruling-class-corruption-and-a-dangerous-subversion-of-democracy/
Brazilian Democracy Thrown to the Dogs
Pepe Escobar.
31.03.2016 13:45
It took only 3 minutes for a bunch of lowly crooks – more known for excelling in corruption than competent administration – to (literally) throw young but vibrant Brazilian democracy to the dogs.
With no votes counted, so traitors would not be publicly identified, the centrist Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro or PMDB) in Brazil abandoned the coalition that supports President Dilma Rousseff in power in Brasilia, thus increasing the chances of a – Kafkaesque – impeachment drive against Rousseff being
The PMDB is Brazil’s largest party – accounting for 69 out of 513 members of Parliament. In the short term, the party will be contributing for constitutionalist coup
The Brazilian Constitution allows for impeachment; but in Rousseff’s case, no undisputable
It gets worse; this undisguised white coup
A jury of crooks
This new phase in Brazil’s massive, ongoing politico
What should be expected is a massive PSYOP for the next few weeks, where the vicious politico/mainstream media/old comprador on coup
Some PMDB congressmen – to their credit – still support Rousseff. Brazilian Federal Police has shown that quite a few PMDB members are directly involved in the massive Petrobras scandal at the heart of the Car Wash investigation – including Temer
Assuming a Temer administration born out of a white coup/regime change comes to fruition, its political platform, according to Brasilia insiders, will have been concocted by the current right-wing opposition, soundly defeated at
Watch that dustbin
Car Wash will then be unmasked for what it is. This tropical remix of the Mani
Car Wash instead was conceived as a relentless New Inquisition machinery operating to the benefit of the same old comprador
As for the whole Rousseff impeachment drive, it rests on a dubious legal proceeding by a former opposition Congressman who is – what else – being investigated himself for corruption.
Military coups are so Pinochet-era. It’s never enough to stress that what’s taking place in Brazil is advanced Hybrid War, a white coup
All bets are still off, though. The regime changers changer
And if by yet another elaborate twist of fate the Brazilian Senate deliberates that Rousseff did not commit a «crime of responsibility» – after all, there’s no evidence she did – the President will be back in power. And the provisional regime change «government» will be thrown to where it already belongs; the stinky dustbin of History.
Langley’s latest themed revolution: the Yellow Duck Revolution in Brazil
The latest themed revolution concocted by the Central Intelligence Agency’s “soft power” agents in the Brazilian federal and state legislatures, corporate media, and courts
Large inflatable yellow ducks—said to represent the economic “quackery” of President Dilma Rousseff and her Workers’ Party government—have appeared at )
After trying to mount an electoral defeat of Brazil’s progressive leftist president, Dilma Rousseff, through a combination of presidential candidate assassination (the aerial assassination of Eduardo Campos in 2014 to pave the way to the presidency for the Wall Street-owned Green candidate Marina da prosecutorial
The Workers’ Party correctly points out that the legislative impeachment maneuvers against Rousseff and the judicial operations against both Rousseff and Lula emanate from Washington. The same “color of law” but CIA-advanced operations were directed against presidents Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner in Argentina, Rafael Correa in Ecuador, Evo Morales in Bolivia, Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela, Fernando Lugo in Paraguay, and Manuel Zelaya in Honduras. In the cases of Lugo and Zelaya, the operations were successful and both leaders were removed from power by CIA
Street protests against Rousseff have, since they began in 2014, taken on the typical Soros themed revolution construct. As with the disastrous Soros-inspired and CIA-nurtured Arab Spring protests in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Tunisia and Euromaidan protest in Ukraine, the Vem Pra Rua movement and the associated Free Brazil Movement are basically nothing more than politically motivated capitalist campaigns relying on Facebook, Twitter, and pro-insurrection television and radio networks, newspapers, and websites.
In addition to the inflatable yellow ducks, street protests have been marked by quickly-manufactured inflatable dolls of Lula in black and white prison garb and a placard cartoon drawing of Rousseff with a red diagonal “No” sign drawn through it. Street protest devices, which also include green and yellow banners and clothing, are telltale signs of significant amounts of money backing the psychological warfare gimmickry.
Brazilian prosecutors on Langley’s payroll arrested the popular Lula after staging a massive police raid on his house. Police also arrested the former First Lady of Brazil, Lula’s wife Marisa Leticia. Lula said he felt that he was kidnapped by the police. In 2009, Honduran troops actually kidnapped President Manuel Zelaya in the middle of the night and detained him in a military cell prior to expelling him from the country. That operation, like the one against Lula and Rousseff, was backed not only by the CIA and NSA, but by the US Southern Command in Miami. The Honduran coup was also backed by the Supreme Court of Honduras. To prevent a further political arrest of her predecessor, Rousseff made Lula her prosecutorial
On March 16, Judge Sergio Moro, who is in charge of Operation “Lava-jato” (“Car wash“), the two-year investigation of Petrobras and the alleged bribery involving Rousseff and Lula, released two taped intercepts of phone calls between the president and former president. The bugged phone conversation involved Rousseff’s plans to appoint Lula as her chief of staff, a cabinet rank, as a way to afford him some protection from the CIA’s judicial-backed coup operation now in play. Rousseff
Judge Sergio Moro’s name appears in one of the leaked State Department cables. On October 30, 2009, the US embassy in Brasilia reported that Moro attended an embassy-sponsored conference in Rio de Janeiro held from October 4–9. Titled “Illicit Financial Crimes,” the conference appears have been an avenue for the CIA and other US intelligence agencies to train Brazilian federal and state law enforcement, as well as other Latin American police officials from Argentina, Paraguay, Panama, and Uruguay, in procedures to mount bogus criminal prosecutions of Latin American leaders considered unfriendly to the United States. The State Department cable from Brasilia states: ”Moro . discussed
One item that was not on the agenda for the US embassy seminar was the NSA’s covert spying on the communications of Rousseff, Lula, and the state-owned Brazilian oil company Petrobras. In a technique known as prosecutorial warrantless Brazilian government codenamed
In what could be called the “Obama Doctrine,” the CIA has changed its game plan in overthrowing legitimate governments by using ostensibly “legal” means. Rather than rely on junta generals and tanks in the street to enforce its will, the CIA has, instead, employed prosecutors, judges, opposition party leaders, newspaper editors, and website administrators, as well as mobs using gimmicks—everything from inflatable yellow ducks, paper mâché puppets, and freshly silk screen-printed T-shirts, flags, and banners—as themed revolution facilitators.
As shown by the leaked State Department cables, the CIA has identified a number of agents of influence it can rely on for providing intelligence on both Rousseff and Lula. These sources have included
In addition to BRICS member Brazil, other BRICS nations have also seen the US increasing its efforts to organize themed revolutions. South Africa is on the target list, as are Russia and China.
- See more at: http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/17651#sthash.LwkcGx7Z.dpuf
http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/17651
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
OKAMOTTO PEDE AO STF ANULAÇÃO DA CARBONO 14
O presidente do Instituto Lula, Paulo Okamotto, enviou ao ministro Teori Zavascki, relator da Operação Lava Jato no Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), uma reclamação contra o juiz Sergio Moro, que conduz os processos da operação em Curitiba. Segundo o documento, ao autorizar a deflagração da 27ª fase da Lava Jato, a Carbono 14, Moro desrespeitou a decisão proferida na quinta-feira (31) pelo STF, segundo a qual o magistrado deve remeter à Corte as investigações contra o ex-presidente Lula, assim como outras apurações ligadas a ele; a defesa do presidente do Instituto Lula argumenta que a Operação Carbono 14 foi baseada nos mesmos inquéritos que deram origem aos mandados de busca e apreensão e condução coercitiva de Okamotto e Lula na 24ª fase da Lava Jato; "Salta aos olhos, aliás, esta estranha maneira casuísta com que a autoridade reclamada tem tratado os institutos da conexão e continência, valendo-se a bel-prazer de pesos e medidas diferentes conforme sua própria conveniência e corriqueiramente insistindo em descumprir as decisões proferidas por este STF", diz o pedido
No comments:
Post a Comment